Greenerd : Pressing for the best solution  
1-800-877-9110  
 
 
ApplicationsIndustriesServicesNews & EventsAbout Greenerd
 
Request a Quote
Dotted Line
Locate a Dealer
Dotted Line
Guide to Press Productivity
Dotted Line
Greenerd Hydraulics
Dotted Line

Search
Find a Press
Search Hydraulic Presses By:
Type:
Literature
Search Arbor Presses By:
Tonnage:
Model Number
Literature
Search

Guide to Press Productivity


Dotted Line

Back
Feb 01, 2018
Teaming Hydraulic Presses with Robotics


Greenerd Draw Press

BY LOUIS A. KREN, SENIOR EDITOR, METALFORMING MAGAZINE FEB 18'
Original Post

Teaming hydraulic presses with robotics can pay big dividends for shops large and small. Read on to see how this combination may boost productivity while promoting employee safety.

Rob Bisbee sees quite an uptick in manufacturers across lower-tiers metalformers seeking out robotics to ease the metalforming process, keeping employees out of harm’s way while boosting productivity in various applications. As senior automation engineer at Greenerd Press & Machine Co., Inc. he’s in a position to know. With theNashua, NH, hydraulic-press provider recently announcing that it has become a Tier One Industrial Authorized Robot System Integrator of automated-equipment manufacturer Fanuc America Corp., Greenerd has full access to Fanuc’s comprehensive roster of robots and related automation. The company has been busy working with metalformers keen on introducing automation into their operations, and MetalForming thought it would be a good time to tap Bisbee’s expertise and find out why hydraulic presses and robots can be an ideal fit.

This horizontal-oriented hydraulic press teams with robots to feed and manipulate heavy, large aluminum blanks, and hold part material during a draw operation. With installation of this cell, a metalformer has increased productivity by 233 percent while saving employ-ees from ergonomic risks related to manually manipulating the heavy part material.

Prior to installing the new cell, explains Bisbee, the cushion would push the material part-way off of the tooling, then an operator would come in to manipulate the material, followed by another push and more manipula-tion—a time-consuming process that also required excessive manual reach and handling. “Now, after the draw, an unload robot holds the drawn part while the cushion ejects it,” he says.

“At this point, the robot essentially performs the same duties as employees had in the previous setup, but instead can maneuver material while the press ram opens and the cushion pushes, saving a large amount of time. This is where the robot and press communicate back and forth, with each taking direction from the other throughout.”

This process repeats for five draws, with dome-shaped parts created from the master blank. Whereas the metal-former had taken roughly a week to run 25 blanks through this process, now, with the new cell setup, that’s been cut to a day-and-a-half, a 233-percent increase in productivity. With the increase in productivity, the metalformer freed its vertical press-es for more work while improving employee safety, according to Bisbee. One operator still assists with loading pallets of blanks and another with removing drawn-part pallets, and pro-ductivity gains have delivered new work, so no employees have been replaced via this automation.

Consider the Automation Option
Chances are that a robot-press team can pay dividends for metalformers large and small. Dealing with hazardous materials? Experiencing bottlenecks due to manual handling? Manipulating large, heavy and unwieldy blanks or parts? Want to hold a forming operation to perform secondary processes in the press? All of these can be addressed with robotic automation. With costs decreasing and the learning/program-ming curve flattening, now may be the time to see where a robot teamed with a hydraulic press makes sense. “Customers tell us that a part is too large, heavy or awkward to handle manually, or placing or orienting blanks involves too much reach into a press,” says Bisbee. “In other cases it is just a matter of speeding production and increasing productivity.” Simpler operation also can boost the pressroom-robotics trend. “Due to the increasing ease-of-use when operating robots, less technical expertise is needed to program and run robots, which makes the technol-ogy more accessible to metalformers across the board,” Bisbee says. “Not that robot capabilities have decreased —they are way up. But users easily can program robots for many applications these days.” Key to programming ease are intu-itive, smartphone-like user interfaces with real-world language, teach pen-dants, and even the ability to hit a ‘record’ button to save sequences that can include end-of-arm-tooling actions and robot-arm manipulations. The robot saves those movements to run again in the future, resulting in con-sistent, repeatable operations. “This can be done for many simple applications, such as unloading small parts or placing them here or there,” Bisbee says. “More complicated pro-cedures involving multiple-axis move-ment and various in-press maneuvers require more intricate programming, but even that has become easier.

“You don’t necessarily have to buy a robot just to run a high-volume repet-itive job,” he continues. “You can buy it to help with a 100-part run, and then switch over for a different 100-part run. You don’t need a master programmer to program a robot.”



Robots and Hydraulic Presses: A Unique Fit
We can see why robots are becom-ing more and more common in press-room environments, and a comple-mentary relationship between hydraulic presses and robotics can bring even greater benefits, according to Bisbee. “In automated cells with hydraulic presses, a robot can perform in con-junction with the press in a unique way,” he says. “At times the press con-troller communicates with the robot, telling it what to do and when and where to move. At other times the robot controller tells the press to move to a certain position in the stroke or at a particular speed in order to place, remove or orient a part. And, the com-munication path can be changed dynamically, as material travels into a press, and as a part routes through and out of the press. At Greenerd, we refer to this as Dynamic Press Control.” Bisbee points out one current appli-cation where, during a draw sequence, the press communicates with the robot, instructing it when to enter the press to hold and extract a part. As the robot removes the part from the tool-ing, it communicates instructions to the press, telling it to move at a certain velocity and hold a certain ram posi-tion during extraction to help ensure proper part removal and the desired part orientation. “Often with a mechanical press, the ram descends, forms the part, ascends and then tells the robot to retrieve the part,” he explains. “The press and robot basically handshake on a discreet level. In the case of a hydraulic press and robot, they communicate on a much higher level to actively handshake and know exactly what the other is doing. It is very complementary. “For example, a hydraulic press can do anything anywhere in the stroke at any time,” Bisbee continues. “So the operation can be programmed to enable the robot to maintain control at a certain point in the stroke, and the press to assume control of the robot in another point in the stroke. Flexi-bility inherent in hydraulic presses enables this level of communication.”

Tandem Technologies in Action
The recent installation referenced above speaks to the efficacy of a hydraulicpress/robot solution. The new $2.2-million cell features a hori-zontal-acting 750-ton Greenerd deep-draw hydraulic press assisted by two Fanuc multi-axis robots. Prior to the installation, several vertical presses performed five draws on 80-100-lb., 0.5-in.-thick aluminum blanks. “These 72-in.-dia. blanks had to be maneuvered by two or three employees into and out of the press,” recalls Bis-bee. “Being vertical presses, using cranes to place blanks and orient parts proved difficult.” Given the large and heavy blanks, Greenerd proposed automating the front end with a robot loading the hor-izontally oriented press. “We provided a cell where, on one side of the press a load robot places a blank in the press, and because the press is horizontal, holds the blank as the ram closes the tooling around the material,” he explains. “Once the press has hold of the blank, the robot exits and after the robot is clear, the press performs a draw. After the draw, a sec-ond robot on the other side of the press enters to remove the drawn part, clear-ing the tool and allowing the first robot to reload another blank for another draw. Here, a cushion assembly used during drawing ejects the part material from the tool. prior to installing the new cell, explains Bisbee, the cushion would push the material part-way off of the tooling, then an operator would come in to manipulate the material, followed by another push and more manipula-tion—a time-consuming process that also required excessive manual reach and handling. “Now, after the draw, an unload robot holds the drawn part while the cushion ejects it,” he says. At this point, the robot essentially performs the same duties as employees had in the previous setup, but instead can maneuver material while the press ram opens and the cushion pushes, saving a large amount of time. This is where the robot and press communi-cate back and forth, with each taking direction from the other throughout. This process repeats for five draws, with dome-shaped parts created from the master blank. Whereas the metal-former had taken roughly a week to run 25 blanks through this process, now, with the new cell setup, that’s been cut to a day-and-a-half, a 233-percent increase in productivity. With the increase in productivity, the metalformer freed its vertical presses for more work while improving employee safety, according to Bisbee. One operator still assists with loading pallets of blanks and another with removing drawn-part pallets, and pro-ductivity gains have delivered new work, so no employees have been replaced via this automation.

Is Automation For You?
Chances are that a robot-press team can pay dividends for metalformers large and small. Dealing with hazardous materials? Experiencing bottlenecks due to manual handling? Manipulating large, heavy and unwieldy blanks or parts? Want to hold a forming operation to perform secondary processes in the press? All of these can be addressed with robotic automation. With costs decreasing and the learning/program-ming curve flattening, now may be the time to see where a robot teamed with a hydraulic press makes sense.

Back




 
Line